From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ibrahim v. McGee Air Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 19, 2023
3:22-CV-00744-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 19, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-CV-00744-VC

05-19-2023

Mohamed Ibrahim on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. McGee Air Services Inc., a Washington Corporation, and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants.


[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA CLAIMS

Vince Chhabria Honorable District Judge.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

On May 11, 2023, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 of the above-referenced Court, via Video, the Court heard Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Preliminary Approval. For the reasons set forth in Plaintiff's moving papers and the presentations at the hearing, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of the settlement of the class action and PAGA claims and makes the following orders:

1. The proposed “Settlement Class” satisfies the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(3). Per Rule 23(a)(1), the class is so numerous, in excess of 2000 employees, that joinder of all members is impracticable. Per Rule 23(a)(2), there are questions of law and fact common to the Class, specifically, were class members entitled to reimbursement for their use of cell phones? Per Rule 23(a)(3), the claims of the representative are typical of the claims of the class, specifically, claims for reimbursement for cell phone use under California Labor Code section 2802. Finally, per Rule 23(a)(4), the Plaintiff has fairly and adequately represented the interests of the class as evidenced by reaching the settlement.

2. The Court also finds that the proposed settlement class meets the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) except that the Court need not consider the manageability of a potential trial, since the settlement, if approved, would obviate the need for a trial.

3. The Settlement Class described in the settlement is conditionally certified for settlement purposes. “Settlement Class” means all current and former California employees (both exempt and non-exempt) who worked for McGee as agents, including station agents, aircraft fleet, aircraft agents, ramp agents, customer service agents, interline agents and/or as supervisors of those positions during the Settlement Class Period, December 30, 2017 through the date of preliminary approval of the Settlement.

4. The Settlement also involves a PAGA Group who worked from October 26, 2020 through the date of preliminary approval of the Settlement. The PAGA Group members, unlike members of the Settlement Class, cannot opt out of the Group. Settlement Class members may opt out of the settlement or object to the Settlement within 45 days after the date of mailing or transmission of the class notice by the Settlement Administrator.

5. The Court preliminarily approves the Stipulation of Settlement of Class Action and Release of Claims (“Settlement Agreement”) between Plaintiff and Defendant McGee Air Services (“Defendant”) as appropriate under Fed R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1)(B) because it is likely to satisfy the standard for final settlement approval under Fed R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2).

6. The Court has determined that disseminating notice of the Settlement to Settlement Class members is justified under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 23(e)(1)(B) because the Court will likely be able to (1) approve the proposal under Rule 23(e)(2) and, (2), certify the class for purposes of judgment on the proposal. The Settlement Agreement is attached to this Order as Exhibit A.

7. The Notice to the Settlement Class members and to the PAGA Group shall be disseminated in the form and manner as set forth in Exhibit 1 to the Settlement Agreement. The Court approves the form of the notice as it provides class members with the information they need about the proposed Settlement and approves the method of dissemination of notice as it meets the requirements of Due Process.

8. Appoints named Plaintiff Mohamed Ibrahim as Class Representative;

9. Appoints the Law Offices of Matthew Kumin as Class Counsel;

10. Appoints CPT to serve as the Settlement Administrator;

11. The Court directs the Settlement Administrator to provide notice to class members as set forth in the Settlement.

12. Sets the following deadlines:

Event

Date

Transmission of Settlement Class List and PAGA Aggrieved Employee Lists from McGee to Settlement Administrator

Twenty-one (21) days after entry of preliminary approval order

Notice of Class Action Settlement mailed to Class Members

Fourteen (14) days after transmission of Settlement Class List and PAGA Aggrieved Employee Lists

Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses

Fourteen (14) days before opt-out and objections deadline

Deadline for Opt-outs and Objections

Forty-five (45) days after mailing of notice

Motion for Final Approval and Class Representative Service Award

Thirty-five (35) days before final approval hearing

Reply Brief(s) in Support of Motions for Final Approval, Attorneys' Fees, and Service Award

Seven (7) days before final approval hearing

Final Approval Hearing

Thursday, August 31, at 1 p.m. by Zoom

13. At the Final Fairness Hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement should be finally approved as fair, reasonable and adequate under Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and rule on the motion for attorney's fees, costs and service award to be submitted by Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ibrahim v. McGee Air Servs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 19, 2023
3:22-CV-00744-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Ibrahim v. McGee Air Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Mohamed Ibrahim on behalf of himself and others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 19, 2023

Citations

3:22-CV-00744-VC (N.D. Cal. May. 19, 2023)