From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyde v. Northumberland Cnty. Prob. Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2013
Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-02394 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-02394

10-31-2013

WALTER HYDE, Plaintiff, v. NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND UNKNOWN WOMAN PROBATION SUPERVISOR, JANE DOE Defendants.


(Judge Brann)


(Magistrate Judge Schwab)


ORDER

BACKGROUND:

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the thorough September 24, 2013 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab. An objection was filed on October 10, 2013, ECF No. 5.

In his objection, the plaintiff did not present any legally valid arguments to alter the outcome of Magistrate Judge Schwab's analysis.

Because this Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Schwab's thorough analysis the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. United States Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. September 24, 2013, ECF No. 4.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma paupris, ECF No. 2 is granted.
3. The action is dismissed with prejudice.
4. The clerk is directed to close the case file.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hyde v. Northumberland Cnty. Prob. Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2013
Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-02394 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Hyde v. Northumberland Cnty. Prob. Dep't

Case Details

Full title:WALTER HYDE, Plaintiff, v. NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-02394 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2013)

Citing Cases

Pettis v. Dauphin Cnty. Prob.

Although individual county probation officers may be subject to suit under § 1983, a Probation Department is…