From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutto v. City of Cleburne

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Sep 9, 2010
No. 11-10-00195-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2010)

Opinion

No. 11-10-00195-CV

Opinion filed September 9, 2010.

On Appeal from the 18th District Court, Johnson County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. T200800104.

Panel consists of: WRIGHT, C.J., McCALL, J., and STRANGE, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The trial court signed its default judgment on June 18, 2009. One year later on June 18, 2010, Don Earl Hutto filed his pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss.

On August 18, 2010, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that it appeared an appeal had not been timely perfected and requesting that Hutto respond showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Hutto has responded to our August 18 letter. In his response, Hutto states that he had no notice of the June 2009 hearing and that he was financially unable to hire an attorney. Hutto argues the merits of his claims but does not establish how this court has jurisdiction over his appeal.

Hutto has not complied with the provisions of TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1, 26.1, or 26.3 and, therefore, has not properly perfected an appeal. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Hutto v. City of Cleburne

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland
Sep 9, 2010
No. 11-10-00195-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Hutto v. City of Cleburne

Case Details

Full title:DON EARL HUTTO, Appellant v. CITY OF CLEBURNE ET AL, Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, Eastland

Date published: Sep 9, 2010

Citations

No. 11-10-00195-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2010)