From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutnick v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Apr 25, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-02243-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-02243-AC

04-25-2013

JASON HUTNICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BESS M. BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GRACE M. KIM
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CAROLYN B. CHEN
Special Assistant United States Attorney

160 Spear Street, Suite 800

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8956

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR

A FIRST EXTENSION OF 45 DAYS FOR

DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 45 days to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This is the first continuance sought by Defendant. Defendant's counsel requests additional time due to a recent and unanticipated reassignment of work assigned to Defendant's counsel that could not be reassigned to another attorney, thus causing an unanticipated increase of press of business. In addition, Defendant's counsel has 9 district court briefs due in the next month. Thus, Defendant's counsel would appreciate the additional time to fully research the issues presented by Plaintiff's 47-page memorandum of points and authorities. The current due date is April 26, 2013. The new due date will be June 10, 2013.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Defendant's counsel apologizes to the Court and to Plaintiff for any inconveniences caused by this extension.

Respectfully submitted,

___________

(As authorized by email on 4/24/2013)

BESS M. BREWER

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ___________

CAROLYN B. CHEN

Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:

___________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hutnick v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Apr 25, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-02243-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Hutnick v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JASON HUTNICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-02243-AC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2013)