From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 17, 2012
104 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 2012)

Summary

In Hutchinson v. Tucker, 124 Mass. 240, where action had been commenced against a defendant personally within the two years then limited for actions by creditors against executors or administrators, it was held that no exception lay to the allowance of an amendment after the expiration of that period, so as to permit the defendant to be charged as administrator.

Summary of this case from Henshaw v. Brown

Opinion

No. SC12–1780.

2012-10-17

Michael D. HUTCHINSON, Petitioner(s) v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, etc., Respondent(s).


Because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 17, 2012
104 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 2012)

In Hutchinson v. Tucker, 124 Mass. 240, where action had been commenced against a defendant personally within the two years then limited for actions by creditors against executors or administrators, it was held that no exception lay to the allowance of an amendment after the expiration of that period, so as to permit the defendant to be charged as administrator.

Summary of this case from Henshaw v. Brown
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:Michael D. HUTCHINSON, Petitioner(s) v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Oct 17, 2012

Citations

104 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. 2012)

Citing Cases

McLaughlin v. West End Street Railway

" R.L.c. 173, § 121. Batchelder v. Pierce, 170 Mass. 260, and cases cited. Driscoll v. Holt, 170 Mass. 262.…

Eaton v. Walker

The effect of the allowance of the amendment was to substitute Walker as an individual in place of Walker as…