From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Tawney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 30, 2013
Case No. 1:13cv285 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13cv285

12-30-2013

MICHAEL HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TAWNEY, Defendant.


Hon. Robert J. Jonker


ORDER

APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on November 12, 2013. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed November 12, 2013, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket #11) is GRANTED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that this action is DISMISSED.

_______________________

ROBERT J. JONKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Tawney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 30, 2013
Case No. 1:13cv285 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Tawney

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TAWNEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 30, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13cv285 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 30, 2013)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Washington

Thus, Plaintiffs Moore, Matlock, and Wines did not properly exhaust any of the claims raised in this lawsuit.…

Casey v. Reed

There is no question of material fact as the evidence shows Casey did not properly exhaust the claims lodged…