From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 10, 1986
724 P.2d 894 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

WCB 83-09115 84-00654; CA A36379

On petitioner — cross-respondent's reconsideration filed July 25, 1986

Reconsideration allowed; reversed and remanded for determination of attorney fees, former opinion ( 80 Or. App. 276, 720 P.2d 1350) otherwise affirmed September 10, 1986

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

James S. Coon and Aitchison, Imperati, Barnett Sherwood, P.C., Portland, for petition.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


RICHARDSON, P.J.

Reconsideration allowed; reversed and remanded for determination of attorney fees; otherwise affirmed.


Petitioner — cross-respondent requests reconsideration of our decision in this case, 80 Or. App. 276, 720 P.2d 1350 (1986), pursuant to ORAP 10.10. We allow the petition, modify our decision and affirm it as modified.

On review, petitioner contended that the Workers' Compensation Board erred in denying penalties and attorney fees which he requested because of SAIF's late denial of his workers' compensation claim. ORS 656.262(10). We affirmed the Board's decision without opinion. Petitioner points out that, under Spivey v. SAIF, 79 Or. App. 568, 720 P.2d 755 (1986), he is entitled to attorney fees. He is not entitled to a penalty for the tardy denial, because there was no compensation then due on which to base a penalty. He is, however, entitled to attorney fees. Spivey v. SAIF, supra.

Reconsideration allowed; reversed and remanded for determination of attorney fees; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 10, 1986
724 P.2d 894 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Delbert Hutchinson, Claimant…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 10, 1986

Citations

724 P.2d 894 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
724 P.2d 894

Citing Cases

Ellis v. McCall Insulation

However, even if the submission of the medical bills constitutes a claim, and SAIF was required to give…