From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Ladot

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 2, 2024
CV 23-9981 DSF (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-9981 DSF (RAO)

04-02-2024

ZONDREIA HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. LADOT, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILING TO FILE A COMPLETE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

On January 29, 2024, the Court postponed ruling on Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (“Request”) because it was incomplete. (Dkt 8). The Court directed Plaintiff to either: (1) refile a fully completed Request; or (2) pay the full filing fee. (Id.). The Court warned that if Plaintiff did not comply within 30 days, the case would be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.).

To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's Order.

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See, e.g., Roberts v. Soc. Sec. Dep't, 2022 WL 4088755, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2022) (action may be dismissed without prejudice where plaintiff fails to establish in forma pauperis status and does not pay the required filing fee).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Ladot

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 2, 2024
CV 23-9981 DSF (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Ladot

Case Details

Full title:ZONDREIA HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. LADOT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 2, 2024

Citations

CV 23-9981 DSF (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2024)