From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchins v. Village of Tupper Lake Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1979
72 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

November 21, 1979


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 16, 1978 in Franklin County, which granted plaintiff's motion for permission to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law. Plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries on January 11, 1978, when he slipped and fell on accumulated snow and ice while walking on a public sidewalk in a Village of Tupper Lake housing project. The 90-day period for service of a notice of claim having expired on April 11, 1978, plaintiff moved for permission to serve a late notice of claim on May 18, 1978. His moving papers allege that he was unable to timely serve a notice of claim due to the injuries he sustained as a result of the fall, and the public corporation had knowledge of the accident no later than April 27, 1978, when plaintiff orally informed the housing authority's executive director of the incident. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the housing authority (see Segreto v Town of Oyster Bay, 66 A.D.2d 796; Dickey v County of Nassau, 65 A.D.2d 780). Subdivision 5 of section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law directs a court to consider whether the public corporation had knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of its accrual or "within a reasonable time thereafter." Special Term based its decision on the housing authority's knowledge of plaintiff's accident only 16 days after the 90-day period terminated and the public corporation's inability to show substantial prejudice due to the delay. We further note that, in the absence of any supporting medical proof, Special Term correctly refused to base its determination on plaintiff's claim of mental incapacity (Matter of Ostrander v City of Syracuse, 40 A.D.2d 622, affd 33 N.Y.2d 960). Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Greenblott, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hutchins v. Village of Tupper Lake Hous. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 21, 1979
72 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Hutchins v. Village of Tupper Lake Hous. Auth

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN D. HUTCHINS, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF TUPPER LAKE HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1979

Citations

72 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Rosenblatt v. City of New York

We find this to be within a reasonable time. In view of the transitory nature of the alleged injury-producing…

Ortega v. New York City Housing Authority

It is well established that the question of whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice…