From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutcheson v. Bank of New York Mellon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 1, 2012
Civ. No. 12-271-CL (D. Or. Mar. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 12-271-CL

03-01-2012

TERRY D. HUTCHESON, and THERESA A. HUTCHESON, Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST, 2006-OA21, MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-OA21 and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Defendants.


TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

PANNER, J.

Plaintiffs seek an ex parte temporary restraining order to enjoin the foreclosure sale of their house. Plaintiffs allege the house is scheduled for a foreclosure sale on March 7, 2012, and that defendants have not complied with the legal requirements for a valid non-judicial foreclosure. Specifically, plaintiffs allege defendants failed to record all assignments of the trust deed in the county land records prior to initiating the foreclosure proceedings. In Oregon, a party initiating non-judicial foreclosure proceedings must record all assignments of the trust deed. ORS 8 6.735(1); Hooker v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., 2011 WL 2119103, *3 (D. Or. May 25) (citing Burgrett v. MERS, 2010 WL 4282105, at *2 (D. Or. Oct. 20) and In re McCoy, 2011 WL 477820, at *3-4 (Bankr. D. Or. Feb. 7)). Plaintiffs allege MERS is listed as the beneficiary on the deed of trust at issue.

Because of the alleged imminent foreclosure sale, and because the presence of MERS demonstrates a high probability that defendants did not comply with the recording requirements of the Oregon Trust Deed Act, I grant plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order (#3). Defendants, and their officers, agents, etc..., and other persons in active concert or participation with defendants, who receive actual notice of this order, are restrained from conducting a foreclosure sale for the following property: 5915 Peace Lane, Central Point, Oregon, from this day until March 14, 2012, at 5:00 p.m. This court will hold a hearing on whether to issue a preliminary injunction at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 2012, in the James A. Redden Courthouse in Medford.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 1 day of March, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

____________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hutcheson v. Bank of New York Mellon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 1, 2012
Civ. No. 12-271-CL (D. Or. Mar. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Hutcheson v. Bank of New York Mellon

Case Details

Full title:TERRY D. HUTCHESON, and THERESA A. HUTCHESON, Plaintiffs, v. THE BANK OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 12-271-CL (D. Or. Mar. 1, 2012)