From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchenson v. American Home Products

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Jun 21, 2006
Case No. 4:03cv260 (N.D. Miss. Jun. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 4:03cv260.

June 21, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court on the renewed motion to dismiss [78-1] filed by Defendant Eli Lilly Corporation ("Eli Lilly"). The plaintiffs have not responded to this motion. The complaint, filed by a group of parents allegedly injured by complications from their children's vaccinations, alleges claims for (1) medical bills and associated expenses, (2) lost wages, and (3) other economic losses. Eli Lilly argues that damages for lost wages are not allowable under Mississippi law in a tort case such as this one. Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 17 (Miss. 1974). Eli Lilly further argues that the plaintiffs claims arising from fraud and misrepresentation should be dismissed due to the parents' failure to adequately plead their claims as required by law. Plaintiffs confess the validity of defendants' motion through their failure to respond.

It is therefore ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss [78-1] is GRANTED, and the claims against Defendant Eli Lilly are DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that the claims against Defendant American International Chemical, Inc., which has joined in Eli Lilly's motion, are also dismissed.


Summaries of

Hutchenson v. American Home Products

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division
Jun 21, 2006
Case No. 4:03cv260 (N.D. Miss. Jun. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Hutchenson v. American Home Products

Case Details

Full title:VANESSA HUTCHENSON et al. Plaintiffs v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS, et al…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Greenville Division

Date published: Jun 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. 4:03cv260 (N.D. Miss. Jun. 21, 2006)