From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hut v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 19, 1987
519 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

Nos. 86-398, 87-1217.

May 19, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Thomas M. Carney, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant/petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee/respondent.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


The court having considered the allegations raised by the defendant in his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, in connection with the appeal from his judgment of conviction and sentence, we find that the allegations of the petitioner/defendant have merit. We grant the petition and reverse the sentence. The trial court is directed to reduce the defendant's sentence of imprisonment to two and one-half years in accordance with the plea agreement and to order the defendant's immediate discharge from custody inasmuch as he has already served his proper sentence. Johnson v. State, 501 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the mandate of this court will be issued with the filing of this opinion.

Writ granted, sentence reversed, and defendant discharged.


Summaries of

Hut v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 19, 1987
519 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Hut v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONY HUT, APPELLANT/PETITIONER, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 19, 1987

Citations

519 So. 2d 1 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

) We again admonish that this situation cannot be permitted to continue. See Hut v. State, 519 So.2d 1 (Fla.…

Cruz v. State

Cruz's total sentence was 6 years, or 2190 days. He calculates he actually served 1379 days on his initial…