From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huston v. Starbucks Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 31, 2023
2:23-cv-00888-KJN (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00888-KJN

05-31-2023

ALEXANDRA HUSTON, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case was removed to federal court on May 11, 2023, and randomly assigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman under Appendix A of the Local Rules. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Under the Initial Scheduling Order, all parties were to inform the Clerk of Court of their decision whether to Consent or Decline magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes in this case by filing their Consent/Decline form within fourteen days of the date the action was filed, in this case by May 28, 2023. (ECF No. 2.) There is no obligation to consent, and no judge will be notified of a party's decision unless all parties have consented. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b)(1).

A review of the docket shows that not all parties have filed their Consent/Decline forms. Accordingly, any party who has not submitted their Consent/Decline form shall do so within seven days of this order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any party who has not submitted their Consent/Decline form shall do so within seven days of this order.


Summaries of

Huston v. Starbucks Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 31, 2023
2:23-cv-00888-KJN (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Huston v. Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDRA HUSTON, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 31, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00888-KJN (E.D. Cal. May. 31, 2023)