From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huston v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 19, 2013
2:12-cv-00282-JAW (D. Me. Jul. 19, 2013)

Summary

rejecting the plaintiff's "mandate rule" argument when, "in reversing and remanding this case, the court did not explicitly or implicitly preclude reconsideration on remand of the Step 4 finding"

Summary of this case from Laura C. v. Saul

Opinion

2:12-cv-00282-JAW

07-19-2013

LORIE HUSTON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed June 30, 2013, the Recommended Decision is accepted.

Accordingly, is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be VACATED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings.

_______________________

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Huston v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 19, 2013
2:12-cv-00282-JAW (D. Me. Jul. 19, 2013)

rejecting the plaintiff's "mandate rule" argument when, "in reversing and remanding this case, the court did not explicitly or implicitly preclude reconsideration on remand of the Step 4 finding"

Summary of this case from Laura C. v. Saul
Case details for

Huston v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LORIE HUSTON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jul 19, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-00282-JAW (D. Me. Jul. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Mathieu v. Colvin

In any event, for the reasons discussed below, I find no reversible error in the administrative law judge's…

Laura C. v. Saul

The administrative law judge may not do anything expressly or impliedly in contradiction to the district…