From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huston v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 8, 1966
27 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

December 8, 1966

Appeal from the Monroe Trial Term.

Present — Bastow, J.P., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The trial court properly found for the defendant and dismissed the complaint. The court, however, erred in basing its decision on the recording act, which has no application to the issue here presented. The findings of the court that the deed was not obtained through fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence and/or mistake on plaintiff's part are well supported by the record and the determination that the deed was not null and void is affirmed.


Summaries of

Huston v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 8, 1966
27 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Huston v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:KATE HUSTON, Appellant, v. JAMES V. ALEXANDER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1966

Citations

27 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)