From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Husten v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nov 29, 2018
File No. 18-cv-2712 (ECT/SER) (D. Minn. Nov. 29, 2018)

Opinion

File No. 18-cv-2712 (ECT/SER)

11-29-2018

Michael John Husten, Plaintiff, v. Warden Michelle Smith, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the November 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. ECF No. 6. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ACCEPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED;

3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

4. No certificate of appealability be issued.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: November 29, 2018

s/ Eric C. Tostrud

Eric C. Tostrud

United States District Court


Summaries of

Husten v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Nov 29, 2018
File No. 18-cv-2712 (ECT/SER) (D. Minn. Nov. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Husten v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:Michael John Husten, Plaintiff, v. Warden Michelle Smith, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Nov 29, 2018

Citations

File No. 18-cv-2712 (ECT/SER) (D. Minn. Nov. 29, 2018)