From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hustead v. Hustead

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 27, 2016
No. 70156 (Nev. Apr. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 70156

04-27-2016

LEE DAVID HUSTEAD, Appellant, v. MARJORIE L. HUSTEAD, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a hearing purportedly held on March 10, 2016, in a divorce action. Second Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Washoe County; Cynthia Lu, Judge.

Our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed, before the entry of a final written judgment, and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). To the extent appellant seeks to appeal from the order striking a request for submission entered February 24, 2016, the order is not appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order striking a request for submission. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Douglas /s/_________, J.
Cherry /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Cynthia Lu, District Judge, Family Court Division

Lee David Hustead

Surratt Law Practice, PC

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Hustead v. Hustead

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 27, 2016
No. 70156 (Nev. Apr. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Hustead v. Hustead

Case Details

Full title:LEE DAVID HUSTEAD, Appellant, v. MARJORIE L. HUSTEAD, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 27, 2016

Citations

No. 70156 (Nev. Apr. 27, 2016)

Citing Cases

Hustead v. Second Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

The records before this court reflect that petitioner's appeal was dismissed as premature. See Hustead v.…