Huskey v. State

Full title: Jerry L. HUSKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Sep 20, 2022

652 S.W.3d 790 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110296

09-20-2022

Jerry L. HUSKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Stephanie Hoeplinger, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENTS: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin E. Davis, Asst. Atty Gen., P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Stephanie Hoeplinger, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENTS: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin E. Davis, Asst. Atty Gen., P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Jerry L. Huskey ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).