Summary
comparing the lack of Spanish legal texts and absence of interpreters to inadequacies of prison law libraries or ignorance of the law and explaining that the Fifth Circuit has held that such claims are not "on a par" with a state-created impediment required by § 2244(d)(B)
Summary of this case from Alvarado v. StephensOpinion
No. 3:02-CV-0778-M
October 15, 2002
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing the objections to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de nova review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.