Opinion
No. 12-2523 No. 12-2530 No. 12-2539 No. 12-2541 No. 12-2579 No. 13-1026 No. 13-1050
05-06-2013
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-03402-RWT); Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge
(8:12-cv-03278-PJM); Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge
(8:12-cv-03281-PJM); Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge
(8:12-cv-03282-PJM); J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge
(8:12-cv-03637-JFM); J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge
(8:12-cv-03643-JFM; 8:12-cv-03647-JFM; 8:12-cv-03646-JFM;
8:12-cv-03644-JFM); Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge
(8:12-cv-03675-AW).
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) actions as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Soros, No. 8:12-cv-03402-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2012); Hurt v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-03278-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 28, 2012); Hurt v. New York, No. 8:12-cv-03281-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2012); Hurt v. Nio Nazi's, No. 8:12-cv-03282-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 28, 2012; Hurt v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-03637-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2012); Hurt v. US Supreme Court Justices, Nos. 8:12-cv-03643-JFM, 8:12-cv-03647-JFM, 8:12-cv-03646-JFM, 8:12-cv-03644-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2012); Hurt v. King, No. 8:12-cv-03675-AW (D. Md. Dec. 26, 2012). The motions for appointment of counsel and to amend the notice of appeal are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED