Hurst v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Full title: Jerry A. HURST, petitioner, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Nov 30, 2009

558 U.S. 1043 (2009)

130 S. Ct. 753

175 L. Ed. 2d 509

78 U.S.L.W. 3321

Opinion

No. 09–6741.

2009-11-30

Jerry A. HURST, petitioner, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

Case below, 324 Fed.Appx. 261.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters*754from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397 and cases cited therein.