From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. Hurst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 25, 2007
973 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

holding that order on motion for clarification which "merely reiterates provisions contained within the previously entered Consent Final Judgment" is not appealable and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Ramos v. State

Opinion

No. 1D07-0430.

May 25, 2007.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. E. McRae Mathis, Judge.

Steven P. Combs of Smith Green Combs, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

A. Russell Smith, Jacksonville, for Appellee.


Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of February 1, 2007, the Court has determined that because the Order Regarding Former Wife's Motion for Clarification merely reiterates provisions contained within the previously entered Consent Final Judgment, the order on appeal is not an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hurst v. Hurst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 25, 2007
973 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

holding that order on motion for clarification which "merely reiterates provisions contained within the previously entered Consent Final Judgment" is not appealable and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Ramos v. State
Case details for

Hurst v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:Jann Kimberly HURST, n/k/a Jann Kimberly Papiernik, Appellant, v. Barry…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 25, 2007

Citations

973 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Ramos v. State

This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Hughes v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 264 So. 3d 1053,…