Opinion
No. 10-2274.
Submitted: May 26, 2011.
Decided: May 31, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-02516-WDQ).
Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jerry A. Hurst appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurst v. City of Salisbury, Md., No. 1:10-cv-02516-WDQ, 2010 WL 4103682 (D.Md. Oct. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.