From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurd v. Opipari

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 10, 2022
510 P.3d 1254 (Nev. 2022)

Opinion

No. 84784

06-10-2022

Kymberlie Joy HURD, Appellant, v. Mario OPIPARI, Respondent.

Kymberlie Joy Hurd Crome Law Firm


Kymberlie Joy Hurd

Crome Law Firm

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

The order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule allows for an appeal from the designated order. See generally In re Temporary Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary order subject to periodic mandatory review). This court lacks jurisdiction, and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Hurd v. Opipari

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 10, 2022
510 P.3d 1254 (Nev. 2022)
Case details for

Hurd v. Opipari

Case Details

Full title:Kymberlie Joy HURD, Appellant, v. Mario OPIPARI, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

510 P.3d 1254 (Nev. 2022)