From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huntsaker v. Moldenhaur

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 12, 2011
SACV 10-01980 GAF (SS), SACV 10-01982 GAF (SS) (C.D. Cal. May. 12, 2011)

Opinion


STEVEN LEE HUNTSAKER, Plaintiff, v. J. MOLDENHAUR, Sheriff Deputy #3642, ET AL., Defendants. STEVEN LEE HUNTSAKER, Plaintiff, v. R. DE LA ROSA, Sheriff Deputy # 5539, ET AL., Defendants. Nos. SACV 10-01980 GAF (SS), SACV 10-01982 GAF (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. May 12, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaints in the above-captioned matters, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing these actions with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Huntsaker v. Moldenhaur

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 12, 2011
SACV 10-01980 GAF (SS), SACV 10-01982 GAF (SS) (C.D. Cal. May. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Huntsaker v. Moldenhaur

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN LEE HUNTSAKER, Plaintiff, v. J. MOLDENHAUR, Sheriff Deputy #3642…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 12, 2011

Citations

SACV 10-01980 GAF (SS), SACV 10-01982 GAF (SS) (C.D. Cal. May. 12, 2011)