From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huntley, Mullaney, Spargo & Sullivan, Inc. v. Bailey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-02934-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-02934-MCE-KJN

3-06-2013

HUNTLEY, MULLANEY, SPARGO & SULLIVAN, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD C. BAILEY, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law RICHARD M WATTS, JR. Attorneys for Plaintiff HUNTLEY, MULLANEY, SPARGO & SULLIVAN, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION WHITNEY M. H. WALSH ( AS AUTHORIZED ON FEBRUARY 27, 2013 ) Attorneys for Defendant EDWARD C. BAILEY


MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
RICHARD M. WATTS, JR., ESQ. (SBN 221268)
JEREMY S. MILLSTONE, ESQ. (SBN 166901)
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Phone: (916) 780-8222
Fax: (916) 780-8775
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HUNTLEY, MULLANEY, SPARGO & SULLIVAN, INC.,
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
WHITNEY M. H. WALSH, ESQ. (SBN 284407)
1080 Delaware Street, Suite 213
Berkeley, CA 94710
Phone: (214) 538-7969
Fax: (214) 367-4325
Attorneys for Defendant
EDWARD C. BAILEY

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS

ACTION


Trial Date: Not Set


Honorable Kendall J. Newman


STIPULATION

Plaintiff Huntley, Mullaney, Spargo & Sullivan, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Edward C. Bailey ("Defendant") do hereby agree and Stipulate to an Order compelling arbitration and dismissing the action.

Plaintiff filed its Petition to Compel Arbitration [Doc. No. 5] on January 10, 2013. Defendant's counsel notified Plaintiff's counsel on February 22, 2013, that Defendant would consent to arbitration so Defendant did not file a response or objection. On February 27, 2013 Plaintiff and Defendant agreed to stipulate to compel binding arbitration pursuant to the terms of the parties' written agreement dated on or about March 1, 2012.

The parties jointly request that the Court enter the following Order approving this Stipulation:

1. The Court enter this Order granting Plaintiff's motion to compel binding arbitration of the parties' dispute pursuant to the arbitration clause set forth in the Agreement entered into between Plaintiff and Defendant on or about March 1, 2012 and pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act; and

2. The Court enter an Order dismissing this action without prejudice to any claims or defenses of the parties.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP

Attorneys at Law

By: _________________________________

RICHARD M WATTS, JR.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HUNTLEY, MULLANEY, SPARGO & SULLIVAN, INC.,

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

By: _________________________________

WHITNEY M. H. WALSH

(AS AUTHORIZED ON FEBRUARY 27, 2013)

Attorneys for Defendant

EDWARD C. BAILEY

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
Richard M. Watts, Jr.

ORDER

The Court hereby approves the parties' stipulation as follows:

1. The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to compel arbitration; and

2. This matter is dismissed without prejudice to the claims or defenses of the parties..

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Huntley, Mullaney, Spargo & Sullivan, Inc. v. Bailey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 6, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-02934-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Huntley, Mullaney, Spargo & Sullivan, Inc. v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:HUNTLEY, MULLANEY, SPARGO & SULLIVAN, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-02934-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2013)