From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. White Castle Sys.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
21 Civ. 2273 (ER) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 2273 (ER) (KHP)

09-14-2021

BRITTANY HUNTER, DOMINIQUE ANGLIN, and ALESHA CHAMPEN on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WHITE CASTLE SYSTEM, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RAMOS, D.J.:

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hunter v. White Castle Sys.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 14, 2021
21 Civ. 2273 (ER) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Hunter v. White Castle Sys.

Case Details

Full title:BRITTANY HUNTER, DOMINIQUE ANGLIN, and ALESHA CHAMPEN on behalf of…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 2273 (ER) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 14, 2021)