From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 14, 2003
No. 05-02-00301-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2003)

Opinion

No. 05-02-00301-CR.

Opinion Filed February 14, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH, Tex.R.App.P. 47.

Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F01-32303-WH. AFFIRMED.

Before Justices WRIGHT, FITZGERALD, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Brandon Lamont Hunter appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. A jury found appellant guilty of the crime and assessed punishment at seven years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Hunter v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Feb 14, 2003
No. 05-02-00301-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2003)
Case details for

Hunter v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON LAMONT HUNTER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Feb 14, 2003

Citations

No. 05-02-00301-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2003)