From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Lopez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 24, 2023
2:23-cv-1734 DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1734 DB P

08-24-2023

JIMMY LEE HUNTER, JR., Plaintiff, v. J. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He filed the complaint and initiated this action on August 16, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). However, plaintiff did not sign his complaint. (See ECF No. 1 at 6.)

The court cannot consider unsigned filings and the complaint shall be stricken from the record for that reason. Fed.R.Civ.P. 11; E.D. Cal. R. 131. Plaintiff has thirty days to file a signed complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1) is stricken because it is unsigned;

2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a signed complaint that complies with the pleading and legal standards set out above;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the civil rights complaint form; and

4. Plaintiff is warned that his failure to comply with this order could result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Hunter v. Lopez

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 24, 2023
2:23-cv-1734 DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Hunter v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY LEE HUNTER, JR., Plaintiff, v. J. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 24, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1734 DB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2023)