Hunter v. County of Sacramento

Full title: ROBERT E. HUNTER, and HOWARD ELEY, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 5, 2015

2:06-cv-00457-GEB-AC, 2:15-cv-00271-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2015)

Opinion

ROBERT E. HUNTER, and HOWARD ELEY, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SHERIFF SCOTT JONES, in his official capacity, Defendants. IN RE: GARY GORSKI, Debtor, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Plaintiff, v. GARY GORSKI; ROBERT HUNTER; HOWARD ELEY; DOUGLAS WHATLEY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY for GARY GORSKI; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA through the Internal Revenue Service; COUNTY OF YOLO; DANIEL KARALASH; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendants. Nos. 2:06-cv-00457-GEB-AC, 2:15-cv-00271-TLN-KJN BK No. 13-33139-C-7 Adv. No. 14-02016-C United States District Court, E.D. California. February 5, 2015

          RELATED CASE ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         The County of Sacramento filed a "Notice of Related Cases" in which it states the above-entitled actions are related. (ECF No. 218.)

         Examination of the actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123. Under the regular practice of this Court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. Therefore, action No. 2:15-cv-00271 is reassigned to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any date currently set in the reassigned case is VACATED. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall show the initials "GEB-AC."

         The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.