From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 21, 2022
No. 28583-21S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 21, 2022)

Opinion

28583-21S

10-21-2022

AMBER ELAINE HUNTER & CHRISTOPHER PAUL MAHONEY-MANASCO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On December 13, 2021, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Christopher Paul Mahoney-Manasco, on the ground that no statutory notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been sent to petitioner Christopher Paul Mahoney-Manasco with respect to taxable year 2018, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to Christopher Paul Mahoney-Manasco's tax year 2018 that would confer jurisdiction on this Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners have failed to do so. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction as to Christopher Paul Mahoney-Manasco is granted. This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Christopher Paul Mahoney-Manasco, and references in the petition to Christopher Paul Mahoney-Manasco are deemed stricken. It is further

ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read "Amber Elaine Hunter,, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".


Summaries of

Hunter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 21, 2022
No. 28583-21S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Hunter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:AMBER ELAINE HUNTER & CHRISTOPHER PAUL MAHONEY-MANASCO, Petitioners v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 21, 2022

Citations

No. 28583-21S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 21, 2022)