From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Sep 2, 2003
113 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. WD 61196

July 8, 2003 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 2, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Boone County, The Honorable Frank Conley, Judge.

Daniel L. Mohs, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John Munson Morris, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Joseph M. Ellis, Chief Judge, Presiding Judge, Harold L. Lowenstein, Judge, and Ronald R. Holliger, Judge.


ORDER


David Smiley appeals the denial, after partial evidentiary hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. That motion alleged that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel concerning: (1) alleged failure of trial counsel to adequately investigate a possible duress defense, (2) trial counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's closing argument, and (3) trial counsel's misleading him regarding the effect of deciding not to testify in his own defense.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hunt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Sep 2, 2003
113 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Hunt v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EARL HUNT, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Sep 2, 2003

Citations

113 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)