From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Hurst

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 9, 2023
4:21-cv-00181-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jan. 9, 2023)

Opinion

4:21-cv-00181-KGB-JTK

01-09-2023

ANTONIO HUNT, ADC #131310 PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS HURST, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 6). The parties have not filed any objections, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Id.).

It is therefore ordered that:

1. Plaintiff Antonio Hunt's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2. The Court recommends that dismissal of this action constitute a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So ordered.


Summaries of

Hunt v. Hurst

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 9, 2023
4:21-cv-00181-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jan. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Hunt v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO HUNT, ADC #131310 PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS HURST, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 9, 2023

Citations

4:21-cv-00181-KGB-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jan. 9, 2023)