From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Hunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 23, 1986
481 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-214.

January 23, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, Wallace E. Sturgis, Jr., J.

Edwin C. Cluster of Ayres, Cluster, Curry, McCall Briggs, P.A., Ocala, for appellant.

Gregory E. Tucci of Berk Tucci, P.A., Ocala, for appellee.


This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment of dissolution. We affirm the award of permanent alimony, see O'Neal v. O'Neal, 410 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), but agree that it was error to provide that the husband pay alimony "so long as he shall live or until the Wife shall remarry." This language is modified to provide that the permanent alimony terminates upon the death of either spouse or the remarriage of the wife, whichever event occurs first. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).

As to the other points raised by the parties, we find no error and affirm.

AFFIRMED as modified.

COBB, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.


Summaries of

Hunt v. Hunt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 23, 1986
481 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Hunt v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:SEABORN M. HUNT, JR., APPELLANT, v. MARGARET G. HUNT, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 23, 1986

Citations

481 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Torrealday v. Torrealday

We therefore remand for modification of the final order to reflect such language. See Canakaris v. Canakaris,…

Schellhammer v. Schellhammer

We modify the final judgment to include this limiting language. See Hunt v. Hunt, 481 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA…