From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunt v. Bloom Energy Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 9, 2023
19-cv-02935-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)

Opinion

19-cv-02935-HSG

03-09-2023

JAMES EVERETT HUNT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL RE: DKT. NO. 193

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendants' administrative motion to consider whether another party's materials should be sealed. Dkt. No. 193. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(f), Defendants filed this motion to consider whether to seal Exhibit 5 attached to their opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for class certification and portions of their opposition that reference the exhibit. Exhibit 5 contains the transcript from Lead Plaintiff James Hunt's deposition, which was initially designated as “Confidential.” However, having reviewed the transcript, Plaintiffs have clarified that they do not believe these materials should remain under seal. Dkt. No. 197. The Court accordingly DENIES the administrative motion to file under seal, Dkt. No. 193, and DIRECTS Defendants to file public versions of all documents for which the proposed sealing has been denied within seven days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hunt v. Bloom Energy Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 9, 2023
19-cv-02935-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Hunt v. Bloom Energy Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EVERETT HUNT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 9, 2023

Citations

19-cv-02935-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023)