From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humphrys v. Winous Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 5, 1955
164 Ohio St. 254 (Ohio 1955)

Opinion

No. 34485

Decided October 5, 1955.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Declaratory judgment action — Corporation's classification of three-member board of directors — Effect — Power to amend code of regulations — Statutory construction — Section 1701.64. Revised Code — Constitutionality — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Section 2, Article I, Constitution — Equal protection of the laws.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Messrs. Thompson, Hine Flory, for appellees.

Mr. Horace Andrews and Mr. Lad J. Roth, for appellants.



It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Humphrys v. Winous Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 5, 1955
164 Ohio St. 254 (Ohio 1955)
Case details for

Humphrys v. Winous Co.

Case Details

Full title:HUMPHRYS ET AL., APPELLEES v. THE WINOUS CO. ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 5, 1955

Citations

164 Ohio St. 254 (Ohio 1955)
129 N.E.2d 822