From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Humes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 6, 1991
578 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-1089.

March 19, 1991. Rehearing Denied May 6, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Dade County, Fred Moreno, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Louis Campbell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Neimand and Avi Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.


Based upon the State's concession that the trial court erred in failing to credit the defendant with an appropriate amount of time served when it resentenced him after revocation of his probation, this cause must be remanded to the trial court for the purpose of allowing the trial court to recalculate the amount of time served for which the defendant must receive credit.

Because the errors that the appellant claims the trial court committed, in imposing the sentences that resulted from the plea bargain entered into by the appellant herein, do not render the original sentences void, the raising of these points now, several years after the imposition of the sentences in question, is, at best, untimely. See Gallagher v. State, 421 So.2d 581 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Humes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 6, 1991
578 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Humes v. State

Case Details

Full title:COREY HUMES, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 6, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)