From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hull v. Wood

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 16, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-817 (CKK) (D.D.C. Jun. 16, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-817 (CKK).

June 16, 2008


MEMORANDUM OPINION


On May 16, 2008, the Court sua sponte issued an Order indicating that the basis for jurisdiction and venue were not apparent in Plaintiff's pro se Complaint, and explaining that a party may not file a Complaint in federal district court without a proper basis for federal court jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3) ("[i]f the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action"). The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a notice stating the basis for federal court jurisdiction and venue in this district no later than June 6, 2008. The Order further stated that if notice were not received by that date, the Court would dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. The Court did not receive a notice from Plaintiff by June 6, 2008, or at any time thereafter. Accordingly, the Court shall dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.


Summaries of

Hull v. Wood

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Jun 16, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-817 (CKK) (D.D.C. Jun. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Hull v. Wood

Case Details

Full title:REYNOLD HULL, Plaintiff, v. JERRY WOOD, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Jun 16, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-817 (CKK) (D.D.C. Jun. 16, 2008)