From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hull v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 20, 2006
No. 04-06-00690-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-06-00690-CR.

Delivered and Filed: December 20, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH

Appeals from the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005-CR-6390 Honorable Juanita A . Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding.

Sitting: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant, Erik Hull, pled nolo contendere to aggravated sexual assault-child. On September 18, 2006, the trial court imposed sentence and signed a certification of defendant's right to appeal stating that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed his notice of appeal, the court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(e). Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, stating "the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect" and that permission to appeal "has been denied by [the] trial court." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (in a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters raised in a written motion ruled on before trial or after obtaining the trial court's permission to appeal). The clerk's record contains a written plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the State and agreed to by the appellant; therefore, the trial court's certification accurately reflects that appellant's case is a plea bargain case and he does not have a right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) provides, "The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on October 23, 2006, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Hull v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 20, 2006
No. 04-06-00690-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Hull v. State

Case Details

Full title:Erik HULL, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Dec 20, 2006

Citations

No. 04-06-00690-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2006)