From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1985
113 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

September 27, 1985

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Motions to reargue granted to the extent that reargument granted and, upon reargument, order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, National Grange Mutual Insurance Company, in accordance with the following memorandum: Upon reargument, we find that National Grange Mutual Insurance Company submitted the necessary certificate of mailing, stamped by a post-office employee, showing that on July 23, 1981, a notice of cancellation was sent to the insured at the address listed on the policy. Thus, defendant is entitled to a judgment declaring that its policy issued to Hughson was effectively canceled pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 (1) and was not in effect at the time of the accident (see, Olesky v Travelers Ins. Co., 72 A.D.2d 924).


Summaries of

Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 27, 1985
113 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Hughson v. National Grange Mutual Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JERALD I. HUGHSON, Respondent, v. NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1985

Citations

113 A.D.2d 1031 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

Generally, proof of proper mailing gives rise to a presumption that the item was received by the addressee…

Abuhamra v. New York Mutual Underwriters

Here, the affidavit of defendant's office manager is sufficient to show that defendant mailed a notice of…