From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Warden

United States District Court, D. Maryland
Jan 28, 2011
Civil Action No. L-11-142 (D. Md. Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. L-11-142.

January 28, 2011


MEMORANDUM


The above-captioned civil rights Complaint was filed on January 14, 2011. Plaintiff seeks to enforce his due-process rights regarding alleged violation of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (IAD), but provides no details regarding the claim. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff indicates that he has money to pay the civil filing fee, but did not pay it because he wants assurances his claim will go forward.

Plaintiff has filed numerous claims regarding an alleged violation of the IAD by the Montgomery County State's Attorney in 1992. To the extent there is a cognizable civil claim arising from an alleged breach of the IAD, it is now time-barred. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 endorses the borrowing of state-law limitations provisions where doing so is consistent with federal law. In Maryland, the statute of limitations used is three years from the date the cause of action accrues. See Md. Cts Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-101. There is little doubt that the instant Complaint concerns the alleged 1992 IAD violation Plaintiff has repeatedly raised. Accordingly, by separate Order which follows, the Complaint will be dismissed.

See Hughes v. State of Maryland, Civil Action L-11-28; see also Civil Action L-05-2595, Civil Action L-07-1094, Civil Action L-08-1237, L-06-1158, Civil Action L-08-3350, and Civil Action L-09-264.

January 28, 2011


Summaries of

Hughes v. Warden

United States District Court, D. Maryland
Jan 28, 2011
Civil Action No. L-11-142 (D. Md. Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Hughes v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND HUGHES, #164814 Plaintiff v. WARDEN Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Maryland

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. L-11-142 (D. Md. Jan. 28, 2011)