From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
May 20, 2011
Case Number: 1:10cv91 (S.D. Ohio May. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:10cv91.

May 20, 2011


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz filed on April 27, 2011 (Doc. 13), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired May 16, 2011, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, based on the analysis of the Report and Recommendation it is ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Since reasonable jurists would not disagree, the petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis and any requested certificate of appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Hughes v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
May 20, 2011
Case Number: 1:10cv91 (S.D. Ohio May. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Hughes v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Case Details

Full title:Marvin L. Hughes, Petitioner(s), v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: May 20, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 1:10cv91 (S.D. Ohio May. 20, 2011)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Moore

A state court finding that the verdict is not against the manifest weight of the evidence implicitly also…