Hughes v. Walker

Full title: DEANGELEO ANTOINE HUGHES, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 20, 2015

2:10-cv-03024-WBS-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2015)

Opinion

DEANGELEO ANTOINE HUGHES, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Respondent. No. 2:10-cv-03024-WBS-GGH United States District Court, E.D. California. February 20, 2015

          ORDER

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         On January 29, 2015, petitioner filed "objections" which this court construes as a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 17, 2014, denying an evidentiary hearing. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id . Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 17, 2014, is affirmed.