From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Marquez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
EDCV 22-02117 KK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

EDCV 22-02117 KK (RAO)

01-31-2024

SAMUEL HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. MARQUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

KENLY KIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 15, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) dated November 9, 2023, Dkt. No. 21, and all other records and files herein. The time for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Marquez

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
EDCV 22-02117 KK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Hughes v. Marquez

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. MARQUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

EDCV 22-02117 KK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)