Hughes v. Crooker

Full title: N.C. HUGHES ET AL. v. E. R. CROOKER

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1907

56 S.E. 510 (N.C. 1907)

144 N.C. 764

Opinion

(Filed 19 February, 1907.)

Ward Grimes for plaintiff.

W. C. Rodman for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The court below has found as a fact that the defendant is a nonresident of North Carolina, and we find there is sufficient evidence to support such finding. The motion to dissolve the attachment was properly denied.

Affirmed.