From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 8, 2002
3:02-CV-280-M (N.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2002)

Opinion

3:02-CV-280-M

October 8, 2002


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


United States Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Cockrell

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Oct 8, 2002
3:02-CV-280-M (N.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2002)
Case details for

Hughes v. Cockrell

Case Details

Full title:MICHEAL ANTHONY HUGHES, Petitioner, v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Oct 8, 2002

Citations

3:02-CV-280-M (N.D. Tex. Oct. 8, 2002)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Dretke

Under these circumstances, there is no basis for statutory or equitable tolling of the AEDPA limitations…

Nelson v. Cockrell

See Fisher v. Johnson, 174 F.3d 710, 715 n. 14 (5th Cir. 1999) (applying § 2244(d)(1)(D) statutory tolling…