From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. City of San Rafael

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 12, 2023
4:23-cv-01063-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-cv-01063-YGR

06-12-2023

DEANNA HUGHES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge

In its March 20, 2023 Order denying preliminary injunctive relief, this Court gave plaintiffs until April 24, 2023 to file an amended complaint and directed that if no complaint was filed, the Court would dismiss the case sua sponte . (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint and have not otherwise advised the Court of their intent to pursue this action. Accordingly, the Court dismisses it with prejudice. This means the case management conference scheduled for this afternoon is Vacated. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

As explained in that order, “sua sponte” means the Court will do so on its own, without further action by either party.

It Is So Ordered.


Summaries of

Hughes v. City of San Rafael

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 12, 2023
4:23-cv-01063-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Hughes v. City of San Rafael

Case Details

Full title:DEANNA HUGHES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 12, 2023

Citations

4:23-cv-01063-YGR (N.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023)