From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huffy Corporation v. Stimac

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Mar 22, 2006
Case No. 3:04-cv-234 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04-cv-234.

March 22, 2006


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER


The Court having been advised that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action (including all claims by all parties) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown not later than May 20, 2006, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The parties may substitute a judgment entry contemplated by the settlement agreement upon approval of the Court. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed. 2d 391, 1994, and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

This Court explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached by the parties, on motion or sua sponte.

Each party shall bear its own costs.


Summaries of

Huffy Corporation v. Stimac

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Mar 22, 2006
Case No. 3:04-cv-234 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Huffy Corporation v. Stimac

Case Details

Full title:HUFFY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD L. STIMAC, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton

Date published: Mar 22, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:04-cv-234 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 22, 2006)