From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huffman v. San Diego Family Hous., LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 6, 2021
20-cv-2514-H-DEB (S.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-2514-H-DEB

10-06-2021

MATTHEW HUFFMAN, et al., Plaintiff v. SAN DIEGO FAMILY HOUSING, LLC, et al, Defendants


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE PROCEEDINGS [DOC. NO. 29.]

MARILYN L. HUFF, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

On November 24, 2020, Plaintiffs Matthew Huffman; April Huffman; A.H, a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Donna Sue Combs; L.H., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Donna Sue Combs; and M.H., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Donna Sue Combs (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendants San Diego Family Housing, LLC and Lincoln Military Property Management LP (“Defendants”) in the Superior Court for the County of San Diego. (Doc. No. 1.) On December 30, 2020, Defendants filed a notice of removal to this Court. (Id.) On January 6, 2021, Defendants filed their answer to Plaintiffs' complaint. (Doc. No. 2.) On July 28, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). (Doc. No. 23.) A hearing for Defendants' motion is currently scheduled for October 25, 2021.

On September 29, 2021, the parties filed a j oint motion to continue the proceedings for ninety (90) days. (Doc. No. 29.) The parties seek to continue the proceedings to pursue a global settlement of this case and four similar cases pending in this District, Lopez, et al. v. San Diego Family Housing, et al, Case No. 20-cv-1915-JAH-AGS; Spangler, et al. v. San Diego Family Housing, et al., Case No. 20-cv-2287-W-AGS; Vincent et al. v. San Diego Family Housing, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01794-LAB-AGS. (Id at 2.) The parties also seek to continue the proceedings to allow for the issuance of an opinion by the Ninth Circuit in Childs v. San Diego Family Housing, LLC, et al., Case No. 20-56049, which addresses an issue relevant to Defendants' pending motion to dismiss. (Id at 2-3.)

After considering the relevant factors, the Court, exercising its sound discretion, grants the parties' request to continue the proceedings. See Keating v. Office of Thrift Supervision, 45 F.3d 322, 324-25 (9th Cir. 1995). The Court continues all dates and deadlines for ninety (90) days from the date this order is filed. The parties are ordered to file a joint status report with the Court no later than December 27, 2021 to inform the Court of the status of the settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Huffman v. San Diego Family Hous., LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Oct 6, 2021
20-cv-2514-H-DEB (S.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Huffman v. San Diego Family Hous., LLC

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW HUFFMAN, et al., Plaintiff v. SAN DIEGO FAMILY HOUSING, LLC, et…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

Citations

20-cv-2514-H-DEB (S.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2021)