Opinion
Civil Action 5:23-CV-141-RWS-JBB
05-03-2024
JOSHUA HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. EAST TEXAS PROFESSIONAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant.
ORDER
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Plaintiff Joshua Huffman's complaint alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act by Defendant East Texas Professional Credit Union. Docket No. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Boone Baxter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to perfect service. Docket No. 5. No objections have been filed.
Because no objections have been received, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203-RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021).
The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 5) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further
ORDERED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Clerk is directed to close the case.
So ORDERED